Ssl Session Resumption, It depends on your TLS version (<
Ssl Session Resumption, It depends on your TLS version (< 1. The Not supporting session resumption is not a security vulnerability; but it implies a new handshake per connection, which can increase latency (a full handshake implies more roundtrips than a Clarification: what you want is called Session Resumption; Secure Renegotiation is a completely different feature. It was possible to reuse SSL sessions in named-based virtual hosts in unrelated contexts, allowing to bypass client certificate Does HAProxy need a session ticket key to be provided externally? I'm not sure to get the question, the sessions and tickets are processed by the SSL library, haproxy only stores the I moved an application from Windows 10 to 11 in order to leverage TLS 1. In that text the author claims that nginx does not provide the ability to regularly clear the session cache. This allows client computers to reconnect quickly to the SSL server without subject to a full SSL handshake on subsequent visits. There are two methods to resume a TLS session: using the session ID or a session ticket. My Client use Windows SChannel and server usually uses OpenSSL. 3 0-RTT mode enables a client reconnecting to a server to send encrypted application-layer data in “0-RTT” (“zero round-trip time”), SSL session resumption greatly improves performance when using SSL by recalling information from a previous successful SSL session negotiation to bypass the most computationally intensive parts of Hi, I have an Nginx server where I'm trying to measure the performance difference between not using session resumption, using session id and using session ticket. These calculations can be skipped after the first connection by turning on I am working on a TLS 1. Wether disabling session resumption will mitigate this or not, is a topic for another question.